General information
Latest issue
Impact factor
License agreement
Submit a manuscript

Search papers
Search references

Latest issue
Current issues
Archive issues
What is RSS

Uspekhi Mat. Nauk:

Personal entry:
Save password
Forgotten password?

Uspekhi Mat. Nauk, 1970, Volume 25, Issue 2(152), Pages 81–140 (Mi umn5321)  

This article is cited in 5 scientific papers (total in 5 papers)

The present state of the theory of games

N. N. Vorob'ev

Abstract: A great amount of information about the theory of games of very varied mathematical content has been accumulated in recent years. The account by Karlin in his monograph [64] of only some of the most highly developed branches of the theory of antagonistic games took up about 500 pages. A common approach to the theory of games as a whole has not yet been worked out. This article attempts to survey systematically the basic branches and directions of the theory of games in its present state. The general definition of a game as a formalized representation of a conflict is taken as a basis. All the “forms” of games considered earlier can be obtained from this definition as particular cases. A systematic look at the theory of games, as in the case of normative theory, enables us to place many of the results of the theory of games in fairly natural groupings. Without being able to give either an exhaustive or even a fairly full description of these results the author has restricted himself to an account of the most typical of them. The amount of detail is not uniform and is inversely proportional to the accessibility of the original material. Facts that can be found in Russian publications are merely noted or just mentioned. In particular, questions considered in the author's survey article [32] are only very briefly touched upon. Specific assertions given in this paper are mainly illustrative in character and some could be replaced by others without detriment. We consider practically all the significant branches of the theory of games with the exception of differential games. Although the theory of differential games has a well-defined place in a number of directions of the theory of games, its methods and problems are becoming increasingly independent. Detailed surveys of the theory of differential games are given in [59], [97]. The author does not touch upon the history of the theory of games and refers the interested reader to the addendum to the Russian edition of von Neumann and Morgenstern's basic monograph “The Theory of Games and Economic Behaviour” [82]. The present article is similar in concept to a paper of the same name given by the author at the First All-Union Conference on the Theory of Games at Erevan in November 1968 (see [123] and [32]), but there are essential differences in the selection of material and the presentation.

Full text: PDF file (7016 kB)
References: PDF file   HTML file

English version:
Russian Mathematical Surveys, 1970, 25:2, 77–136

Bibliographic databases:

UDC: 518.90
MSC: 91A06, 91A12, 91A13, 91A15, 91A35, 91A46
Received: 13.11.1969

Citation: N. N. Vorob'ev, “The present state of the theory of games”, Uspekhi Mat. Nauk, 25:2(152) (1970), 81–140; Russian Math. Surveys, 25:2 (1970), 77–136

Citation in format AMSBIB
\by N.~N.~Vorob'ev
\paper The present state of the theory of games
\jour Uspekhi Mat. Nauk
\yr 1970
\vol 25
\issue 2(152)
\pages 81--140
\jour Russian Math. Surveys
\yr 1970
\vol 25
\issue 2
\pages 77--136

Linking options:

    SHARE: FaceBook Twitter Livejournal

    Citing articles on Google Scholar: Russian citations, English citations
    Related articles on Google Scholar: Russian articles, English articles

    This publication is cited in the following articles:
    1. V. F. Dem'yanov, V. N. Malozemov, “On the theory of non-linear minimax problems”, Russian Math. Surveys, 26:3 (1971), 57–115  mathnet  crossref  mathscinet  zmath
    2. Victor V. Rozen, “Equilibrium Points in Games with Ordered Outcomes”, Contributions to Game Theory and Management, 3 (2010), 368–386  mathnet
    3. Matveev V.A., “Konusnaya optimalnost v igrovoi dinamicheskoi zadache c vektornymi vyigryshami”, Nauchno-tekhnicheskie vedomosti spbgpu, 2011, no. 115, 105–113  elib
    4. Irina A. Bashlaeva, Vasiliy N. Lebedev, “Search for a fixed point discrete operator”, Autom. Remote Control, 77:4 (2016), 708–715  mathnet  crossref  isi
    5. Vladislav I. Zhukovskiy, Konstantin N. Kudryavtsev, “Pareto-equilibrium strategy profile”, Autom. Remote Control, 77:8 (2016), 1500–1510  mathnet  crossref  isi
  • Успехи математических наук Russian Mathematical Surveys
    Number of views:
    This page:1474
    Full text:613
    First page:1

    Contact us:
     Terms of Use  Registration  Logotypes © Steklov Mathematical Institute RAS, 2020