Computer Optics
RUS  ENG    JOURNALS   PEOPLE   ORGANISATIONS   CONFERENCES   SEMINARS   VIDEO LIBRARY   PACKAGE AMSBIB  
General information
Latest issue
Archive

Search papers
Search references

RSS
Latest issue
Current issues
Archive issues
What is RSS



Computer Optics:
Year:
Volume:
Issue:
Page:
Find






Personal entry:
Login:
Password:
Save password
Enter
Forgotten password?
Register


Computer Optics, 2024, Volume 48, Issue 2, Pages 242–252
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18287/2412-6179-CO-1343
(Mi co1234)
 

This article is cited in 8 scientific papers (total in 8 papers)

IMAGE PROCESSING, PATTERN RECOGNITION

Comparative analysis of neural network models performance on low-power devices for a real-time object detection task

A. Zagitov, E. Chebotareva, A. Toschev, E. Magid

Institute of Information Technology and Intelligent Systems, Kazan Federal University
References:
Abstract: A computer vision based real-time object detection on low-power devices is economically attractive, yet a technically challenging task. The paper presents results of benchmarks on popular deep neural network models, which are often used for this task. The results of experiments provide insights into trade-offs between accuracy, speed, and computational efficiency of MobileNetV2 SSD, CenterNet MobileNetV2 FPN, EfficientDet, YoloV5, YoloV7, YoloV7 Tiny and YoloV8 neural network models on Raspberry Pi 4B, Raspberry Pi 3B and NVIDIA Jetson Nano with TensorFlow Lite. We fine-tuned the models on our custom dataset prior to benchmarking and used post-training quantization (PTQ) and quantization-aware training (QAT) to optimize the models’ size and speed. The experiments demonstrated that an appropriate algorithm selection depends on task requirements. We recommend EfficientDet Lite 512$\times$512 quantized or YoloV7 Tiny for tasks that require around 2 FPS, EfficientDet Lite 320$\times$320 quantized or SSD Mobilenet V2 320$\times$320 for tasks with over 10 FPS, and EfficientDet Lite 320$\times$320 or YoloV5 320$\times$320 with QAT for tasks with intermediate FPS requirements.
Keywords: computer vision, image analysis, object detection, deep learning, benchmarking, optimization techniques, edge devices
Received: 10.05.2023
Accepted: 03.08.2023
Document Type: Article
Language: English
Citation: A. Zagitov, E. Chebotareva, A. Toschev, E. Magid, “Comparative analysis of neural network models performance on low-power devices for a real-time object detection task”, Computer Optics, 48:2 (2024), 242–252
Citation in format AMSBIB
\Bibitem{ZagCheTos24}
\by A.~Zagitov, E.~Chebotareva, A.~Toschev, E.~Magid
\paper Comparative analysis of neural network models performance on low-power devices for a real-time object detection task
\jour Computer Optics
\yr 2024
\vol 48
\issue 2
\pages 242--252
\mathnet{http://mi.mathnet.ru/co1234}
\crossref{https://doi.org/10.18287/2412-6179-CO-1343}
Linking options:
  • https://www.mathnet.ru/eng/co1234
  • https://www.mathnet.ru/eng/co/v48/i2/p242
  • This publication is cited in the following 8 articles:
    Citing articles in Google Scholar: Russian citations, English citations
    Related articles in Google Scholar: Russian articles, English articles
    Computer Optics
     
      Contact us:
     Terms of Use  Registration to the website  Logotypes © Steklov Mathematical Institute RAS, 2025