Persons
RUS  ENG    JOURNALS   PEOPLE   ORGANISATIONS   CONFERENCES   SEMINARS   VIDEO LIBRARY   PACKAGE AMSBIB  
 
Vedeshenkov, Viktor Alekseevich
Main Scientist Researcher
Doctor of technical sciences

https://www.mathnet.ru/eng/person56273
List of publications on Google Scholar
https://zbmath.org/authors/ai:vedeshenkov.v-a
https://mathscinet.ams.org/mathscinet/MRAuthorID/559189

Publications in Math-Net.Ru Citations
2018
1. V. A. Vedeshenkov, “Fragment method of restoring the operation of digital systems with the structure of a minimal quasicomplete graph with two paths between two users”, Avtomat. i Telemekh., 2018, no. 3,  76–91  mathnet  elib; Autom. Remote Control, 79:3 (2018), 451–462  isi  scopus 1
2. V. A. Vedeshenkov, “Method of controlling test construction for digital systems with minimal quasicomplete graph structure (on example of graph by dimension $11\times 11$)”, Probl. Upr., 2018, no. 3,  33–39  mathnet
3. V. A. Vedeshenkov, “The approach to an organization fault – tolerant digital systems with minimal quasicomplete graph structures with two paths between two abonents (an example of graph by dimension $11\times11$)”, UBS, 73 (2018),  157–183  mathnet
2017
4. V. A. Vedeshenkov, “A fragmentation approach to diagnosis of digital systems components with minimal quasicomplete graph structures (an example of 7x7 graph)”, UBS, 66 (2017),  171–197  mathnet  elib 1
2016
5. V. A. Vedeshenkov, E. A. Kurako, V. N. Lebedev, “Diagnosability of digital systems structured as minimal quasicomplete $7\times7$ graph”, Avtomat. i Telemekh., 2016, no. 3,  152–165  mathnet  elib; Autom. Remote Control, 77:3 (2016), 485–494  isi  scopus 3
6. V. A. Vedeshenkov, “An approach to fragmentary diagnosing of digital systems components with minimal quasicomplete graph structure (on example of the graph by dimension $7\times7$)”, Probl. Upr., 2016, no. 6,  53–58  mathnet 4
7. V. A. Vedeshenkov, “The organization of single faulty components diagnosing in digital systems with minimal quasicomplete graph structure by dimension $7\times7$ with two paths between two abonents”, Probl. Upr., 2016, no. 1,  65–72  mathnet; Automation and Remote Control, 78:12 (2017), 2232–2240 4
2015
8. V. A. Vedeshenkov, E. A. Kurako, V. N. Lebedev, “On diagnosability of components in digital systems with structure of minimal quasicomplete 7х7 graph with 2 paths connecting 2 terminals”, UBS, 58 (2015),  90–114  mathnet  elib 3
2014
9. V. A. Vedeshenkov, “On the route-oriented method of system diagnostics in digital systems structured as a symmetric bipartite graph”, Avtomat. i Telemekh., 2014, no. 9,  133–143  mathnet; Autom. Remote Control, 75:9 (2014), 1646–1654  isi  scopus
10. V. A. Vedeshenkov, E. A. Kurako, V. N. Lebedev, “On diagnosing of digital systems with minimal quasicomplete graph structures by dimension $7\times7$”, Probl. Upr., 2014, no. 6,  68–76  mathnet 5
2013
11. V. A. Vedeshenkov, “An approach to diagnosing of the arising fault in digital systems with symmetric bipartite graph structures”, Probl. Upr., 2013, no. 2,  36–40  mathnet
2010
12. V. A. Vedeshenkov, “An Approach for multi-agent organization of system diagnostics for non-uniform digital systems with symmetric bipartite graph structure”, Avtomat. i Telemekh., 2010, no. 6,  142–154  mathnet  mathscinet  zmath; Autom. Remote Control, 71:6 (2010), 1105–1116  isi  scopus
13. V. A. Vedeshenkov, “One approach to diagnosing heterogeneous digital systems with symmetric bipartite graph structures”, Probl. Upr., 2010, no. 5,  48–56  mathnet 1
2009
14. V. A. Vedeshenkov, “An approach to multiagent organization of system diagnosis of digital systems structured as symmetrical bipartite graph”, Avtomat. i Telemekh., 2009, no. 11,  161–171  mathnet  zmath; Autom. Remote Control, 70:11 (2009), 1913–1922  isi  scopus 4
15. V. A. Vedeshenkov, “Organization of diagnosing of digital systems with symmetric bipartite graph structures”, Probl. Upr., 2009, no. 6,  59–67  mathnet 8
2008
16. V. A. Vedeshenkov, V. N. Lebedev, “Multiagent organization of system diagnosis of large toroidal digital systems”, Avtomat. i Telemekh., 2008, no. 2,  154–170  mathnet  mathscinet  zmath; Autom. Remote Control, 69:2 (2008), 318–333  isi  scopus 2
2007
17. V. A. Vedeshenkov, “An approach to checkyng large-scale digital systems with toroidal grid-type structure”, Probl. Upr., 2007, no. 2,  35–39  mathnet
2006
18. V. A. Vedeshenkov, “An approach to self-diagnosis of nonuniform digital systems”, Avtomat. i Telemekh., 2006, no. 1,  162–177  mathnet  mathscinet  zmath; Autom. Remote Control, 67:1 (2006), 148–160  scopus 2
19. V. A. Vedeshenkov, “A method for parcelling out the subsystems of sufficient dimension for parallel diagnosis of large digital systems with regular structure”, Probl. Upr., 2006, no. 5,  74–79  mathnet 1
2005
20. V. A. Vedeshenkov, “An approach to self-diagnosis of a newly developed fault in digital systems”, Avtomat. i Telemekh., 2005, no. 4,  127–140  mathnet  mathscinet  zmath; Autom. Remote Control, 66:4 (2005), 620–632  scopus 1
21. V. A. Vedeshenkov, “A route-oriented self-diagnosis method for digital systems”, Avtomat. i Telemekh., 2005, no. 3,  154–168  mathnet  mathscinet  zmath; Autom. Remote Control, 66:3 (2005), 479–491  scopus 2
22. V. A. Vedeshenkov, “Способ самодиагностирования неоднородных цифровых систем”, Probl. Upr., 2005, no. 4,  33–40  mathnet 1
2004
23. V. A. Vedeshenkov, “Local Self-Diagnosis of Failed Components in Digital Systems”, Avtomat. i Telemekh., 2004, no. 5,  126–141  mathnet  zmath; Autom. Remote Control, 65:5 (2004), 800–813  isi  scopus 2
24. V. A. Vedeshenkov, “System-level self-diagnosis of arising faults and their elimination in reconfigurable systems”, Probl. Upr., 2004, no. 3,  48–61  mathnet 2
2003
25. V. A. Vedeshenkov, “Self-Diagnosis of Digital Systems”, Avtomat. i Telemekh., 2003, no. 11,  165–182  mathnet  zmath; Autom. Remote Control, 64:11 (2003), 1794–1809  isi  scopus 16
26. V. A. Vedeshenkov, “Operability Restoration Procedure for Fault-Tolerant Digital Systems with Dynamic Redundancy”, Avtomat. i Telemekh., 2003, no. 5,  167–179  mathnet  mathscinet  zmath; Autom. Remote Control, 64:5 (2003), 824–834  isi  scopus 3
27. V. A. Vedeshenkov, “Using the Redundant Chords of the $k$-Fault-Tolerant Graph to Eliminate the Effect of Failed Components”, Avtomat. i Telemekh., 2003, no. 4,  114–122  mathnet  zmath; Autom. Remote Control, 64:4 (2003), 618–625  isi  scopus 3
28. V. A. Vedeshenkov, “System-level self-diagnosis of reconfigurable systems”, Probl. Upr., 2003, no. 4,  39–51  mathnet 3
2002
29. V. A. Vedeshenkov, “On the BGM Model-Based Diagnosis of Failed Modules and Communication Lines in Digital Systems”, Avtomat. i Telemekh., 2002, no. 2,  159–171  mathnet  zmath; Autom. Remote Control, 63:2 (2002), 316–327  isi  scopus 12
2001
30. V. A. Vedeshenkov, “On the System Diagnostics of Faulty Modules and Connections in Hypercube Structures of Multiprocessor Networks”, Avtomat. i Telemekh., 2001, no. 12,  83–94  mathnet  mathscinet  zmath; Autom. Remote Control, 62:12 (2001), 2004–2014  isi  scopus 3
2000
31. V. A. Vedeshenkov, “On diagnosis of failed modules in digital systems by three-module chains”, Avtomat. i Telemekh., 2000, no. 8,  156–164  mathnet  zmath; Autom. Remote Control, 61:8 (2000), 1382–1389 1
1989
32. V. A. Vedeshenkov, “On the duration of the self-diagnosing procedure for digital systems with failed modules”, Avtomat. i Telemekh., 1989, no. 5,  143–148  mathnet  zmath; Autom. Remote Control, 50:5 (1989), 692–695
1985
33. V. A. Vedeshenkov, V. Yu. Kotel'nikov, “On Diagnosis of Faulty Modeles in Digital Systems by Incomplete Tests”, Avtomat. i Telemekh., 1985, no. 8,  122–132  mathnet
1983
34. V. A. Vedeshenkov, “On design of self-diagnosing digital systems”, Avtomat. i Telemekh., 1983, no. 7,  133–144  mathnet  mathscinet  zmath; Autom. Remote Control, 44:7 (1983), 939–948 2
1982
35. V. A. Vedeshenkov, N. A. Vlasenko, A. F. Volkov, “Choice of throughput for a set of processors in designing a family of special-purpose computer systems”, Avtomat. i Telemekh., 1982, no. 4,  150–159  mathnet  zmath; Autom. Remote Control, 43:4 (1982), 552–559
1977
36. V. A. Vedeshenkov, A. F. Volkov, G. B. Semenov, “On one way tо estimate redundancy of self-repairing computing”, Avtomat. i Telemekh., 1977, no. 6,  158–166  mathnet
37. V. A. Vedeshenkov, A. V. Tyurin, “Locating a faulty unit by a sequence of diagnosing tests”, Avtomat. i Telemekh., 1977, no. 3,  126–137  mathnet
1975
38. V. A. Vedeshenkov, “One approach to organizing test diagnostics of faults in discrete devices to within a block”, Avtomat. i Telemekh., 1975, no. 8,  122–131  mathnet  zmath; Autom. Remote Control, 36:8 (1975), 1317–1325
1969
39. A. F. Volkov, V. A. Vedeshenkov, V. D. Zenkin, “Microcontrol and diagnosis of faults in digital computers”, Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 187:4 (1969),  750–753  mathnet
40. V. A. Vedeshenkov, “Фрагментный способ восстановления работоспособности цифровых систем со структурой минимального квазиполного графа с 2 путями между 2 абонентами (на примере графа размера 11х11)”, Avtomat. i Telemekh.,  0  mathnet
1977
41. V. A. Vedeshenkov, E. S. Sogomonyan, “The sixth International symposium on reliability of computer systems and processes”, Avtomat. i Telemekh., 1977, no. 11,  204–208  mathnet
1976
42. V. A. Vedeshenkov, “The fifth International symposium on reliability of computer systems and processes”, Avtomat. i Telemekh., 1976, no. 2,  200–204  mathnet

Organisations